A cash flow statement tracks the actual cash that moved in and out of a company during the year, sorted into three buckets: operating, investing and financing. It matters because reported profit is an accounting opinion. Cash in the bank is a fact.
How can profit and cash be different?
Rahul runs a small furniture workshop. In March he sells ₹5,00,000 of furniture to a hotel, payable in 90 days. His books show ₹5,00,000 of revenue and a healthy profit, but his bank account hasn't moved, and he still must pay his carpenters this month. Profitable on paper, short of cash in reality.
Listed companies work the same way. The profit and loss statement records revenue when a sale is made, not when it is paid for. It also deducts depreciation, which is a real cost but not a cash payment this year. The cash flow statement strips all that out and answers one blunt question: how much cash actually arrived, and where did it go?
What are the three buckets?
Here is Kaveri Motors, our fictional vehicle maker, for the year:
| Bucket | ₹ crore | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Operating activities | +130 | Cash from actually selling vehicles, after paying suppliers, staff and taxes |
| Investing activities | −80 | New machinery bought, investments made or sold |
| Financing activities | −30 | Loans taken or repaid, dividends paid, shares issued |
| Net change in cash | +20 |
Operating cash flow (+₹130 crore) is the one to watch. Kaveri Motors reported a net profit of ₹100 crore; operating cash flow of ₹130 crore is higher mainly because ₹50 crore of depreciation was added back (no cash left the company for it), partly offset by cash stuck in higher inventory and receivables. Over several years, operating cash flow and net profit should travel roughly together. When profit marches up but operating cash flow stays flat or negative, something needs explaining.
Investing cash flow (−₹80 crore) is usually negative for a growing company. It's spending on new capacity. That's healthy spending, as long as the operating bucket funds it.
Financing cash flow (−₹30 crore) shows the company repaid some borrowings and paid a dividend. A company that funds itself year after year by fresh loans or fresh shares, because operations bring in nothing, is running on borrowed time.
What is the profitable-but-cash-starved trap?
Consider Sundar Textiles, a fictional fabric maker. For three years running it reports rising profits, ₹30 crore, ₹40 crore, ₹50 crore. Impressive, until you notice its operating cash flow: −₹5 crore, −₹15 crore, −₹25 crore. Its "sales" are piling up as unpaid receivables from doubtful buyers. The profits exist only in the accounts. Eventually it cannot pay salaries or interest, and the story unravels. A pattern that features prominently in what are red flags in company accounts.
This is why experienced readers open the cash flow statement before admiring the profit growth. Profit can be manufactured for a while; cash is much harder to fake.
Things to keep in mind
- Compare net profit with operating cash flow over three to five years. Occasional gaps are normal; a persistent gap is a question mark.
- Negative investing cash flow is often good (growth spending); negative operating cash flow rarely is.
- A single year can mislead. A big one-time tax payment or inventory build can dent an otherwise healthy year.
- Strong cash flow describes the business, not the stock price. It is evidence for your judgement, never a signal by itself.
Read next
What are ROE and ROCE? — Put the three together and ask the real question: how well is capital being used?